Quoted on Lawsuits against NVIDIA by Outlook Business
From Abhivardhan, our Chairperson
I was honourably quoted by @outlookbusiness on NVIDIA facing lawsuits from regulators across the world.
On copyright: I had written a report with Kapil Naresh an year ago how manufacturing consent in the process of undergoing prompt engineering for GenAI tools could become a nightmare (Read the report at https://www.indicpacific.com/post/new-report-deciphering-regulative-methods-for-generative-ai-vligta-tr-002).
I’m quoted in reference to that.
Now, my views always evolve and I believe that processing original content and augmenting a more autonomous approach to consent is a must from end users.
However, that rests on how content provenance measures & associated incident response protocols work (check https://aiact.in V4 now).
That also helps in finding a decentralised approach to counter deepfakes.
Also, I don’t think compensation to artists will be happening because beyond not having consent, the fair use justification has not been clear. Still, it is a fait accompli, and thus, it is necessary that governments make sure that content labelling remains accurate & doesn't demonetise people.
Micro-payment compensations might not work either because the B2C marketing-advertising market is sometimes heavily saturated. In some cases they might work, while in some cases, it is a hard ball.
What do you think?